Getting Too Technical With Recording

Getting Too Technical With Recording

A picture of audio engineer Graham Cochrane

This is a guest post by audio engineer Graham Cochrane

There is a looming problem in the recording world: people are over complicating the recording process and getting too technical. Yes, there are so many intricacies and details to learn and you never feel like you’ve “arrived”, but at the end of the day I personally believe too many of us are focusing on the absolute wrong things when it comes to capturing great sounding tracks.

Converters Are Not Your Problem

If you’ve hung out on an audio forum for 30 seconds, you’ve probably read a thread or post about A to D and D to A converters. Specifically how in order to get “real recordings” you need to spend decent bucks on premium ones. Of course people disagree on which converters are the “right” ones to get (that doesn’t tip anyone off??), but the pitch is the same: ditch the converters in your audio interface and upgrade. As important as a converter is in the process of turning your analog sound into a digital signal to be used in your recording software, you already have one in your interface that does a great job and really it’s not where you need to focus your attention.

Your recordings will improve WAY faster if you spend the time experimenting with mic placement. Sound boring? Well that’s what recording is all about people. Microphones don’t have brains so you need to tell them what to “hear” in order to capture the most clear, punchy, and life-like sound. A great drum recording or vocal recording comes not from high end converters (as converters simply convert what you mic up), but rather from proper mic placement on a quality source.

Sample Rates Are Not Your Problem

The next recording decision people get stuck on is which sample rate to record with. 44.1khz? 48? all the way up to 192?! Even the most basic of audio interfaces these days come with at least two options for sample rates so this problem can plague the most novice of us home studio users. While it is true that higher sample rates capture sound in more detail (think of a video camera with more frames per second), in the end we deliver music in 44.1khz files (wave, MP3, aiff, etc). It always has to be converted back down to the bottom of the barrel.

The simple truth is I think you are wasting your time if you get hung up on which sample rate to use. If you like 48khz, then use it. If you like higher, fine. I personally record at 44.1 and call it a day. To make better recordings you need to move PAST the sample rate decision and focus more on things like microphone choice, good arrangements, the acoustics in your room, etc. Making changes in those areas will gain you results you can actually hear.

Don’t Let Technical Issues Or Gear Be A Crutch

At the end of the day too many home studio owners are throwing up a mic infront of an audio source, hitting record, and ulitmately not getting the results they want. Where do they turn for improvement? Gear. They grab a “better” mic, some “better” converters, maybe even some premium cables! Yikes!

When in reality, recording is way simpler than that. Get the microphone where it needs to be in order to capture the instrument/vocalist where it sounds best. Simple to say, harder to learn, but it’s doable and it’s free. Don’t get so technical my friends that you miss the point.

About the author:

Graham Cochrane is a proficient audio engineer that provides numerous services to musicians, artists and producers. From mixing to mixing critique, mastering, one on one training for Pro Tools, and a long list of other great services, Graham has you covered. To learn more about Graham visit his website.

April 15, 2013 Music Production 1 Comment

Like this Article? Share it!

1 Comment

    Leave A Response

    Current day month ye@r *